Skip to main content

Looking for Valuant? You are in the right place!

Valuant is now Abrigo, giving you a single source to Manage Risk and Drive Growth

Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy your new web experience.

Looking for DiCOM? You are in the right place!

DiCOM Software is now part of Abrigo, giving you a single source to Manage Risk and Drive Growth. Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy your new web experience.

How Can Credit Underwriting Help Maintain Credit Quality?

Abrigo
June 23, 2016
Read Time: 0 min

As the OCC noted in its 2015 Survey of Credit Underwriting Practices, credit risk is increasing as underwriting standards have eased more than tightened for commercial and retail loan products for the third consecutive year amid increased competition for business. “Similar to pre-crisis surveys, the 2015 survey reflects that many banks are pursuing portfolio growth and yield by loosening underwriting standards,” the OCC said. Regulators’ supervisory efforts will continue to focus on credit risk tied to increasing loan volumes and easing standards. Credit analysts, credit managers, and chief credit officers can protect the institution by ensuring sufficient controls in the underwriting process through the actions below.

 

Provide consistency to cash flow analysis

Many financial institutions use software to perform cash flow analysis. An automated system allows banks and credit unions to underwrite loans more efficiently while maintaining consistency and transparency that can reduce risk and improve credit quality. By standardizing the input process and reducing the potential for double-counting, it decreases the potential for human error and reduces subjectivity that can occur with calculations and analyses that may differ from individual to individual.

 

Standardize the risk rating process

Institutions regulated by the OCC are likely already being required to conduct some sort of standardized, quantitative calculation. “Even if they’re not OCC-regulated, we’re seeing a trend that makes it more likely that they will have to have this,” Brown says. With the FASB’s current expected credit loss, or CECL, on the horizon, there’s also a larger focus on the risk-rating process because that directly impacts the allowance calculation.

Increase objectivity with detailed, standardized documentation.

Request more information

The worst-case scenario is for loan officers to be subjectively rating the risk, given their financial motivations to encourage loan closings. However, even if analysts are providing the risk rating, it’s important to create an environment that promotes efficient and consistent ratings from analyst to analyst. 

The risk rating sets the stage for how often the loan will be reviewed and how it will be reviewed. Consequently, an institution without a reliable and consistent method for rating risk will find it difficult to have an accurate read on the borrower’s ability to repay the loan and may be less likely to learn early on when asset quality has deteriorated. Standardized risk rating processes, on the other hand, improve defensibility of the loan decisioning and monitoring process.

About the Author

Abrigo

Abrigo enables U.S. financial institutions to support their communities through technology that fights financial crime, grows loans and deposits, and optimizes risk. Abrigo’s platform centralizes the institution’s data, creates a digital user experience, ensures compliance, and delivers efficiency for scale and profitable growth. Make Big Things Happen.

Full Bio

About Abrigo

Abrigo enables U.S. financial institutions to support their communities through technology that fights financial crime, grows loans and deposits, and optimizes risk. Abrigo's platform centralizes the institution's data, creates a digital user experience, ensures compliance, and delivers efficiency for scale and profitable growth.

Make Big Things Happen.